Talk:Lomandra filiformis

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: New South Wales / Queensland / Victoria / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Lomandra filiformis is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales, or the State Library of Victoria, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Identification[edit]

These current two photographs are not L. filiformis, which i know very well as a professional field botanist in eastern Victoria, on & off since the late 1980s. Please refer to here, here, here,here & here, for examples.

Looks like Lomandra longifolia only in flower not in fruit, and/or a weak form or Lomandra longifolia subsp. exilis. In fruit, as can be seen in the photos here & here, the individual fruits are much 'chunkier' than individual flowers, making the inflorescence much 'fatter' looking (sorry not the best words—busy!) Cheers. PS. if i have time i'll come back, perhaps with good photos of my own, and do some work editing. ——--macropneuma 06:23, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Lomandra filiformis1.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:37, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Lomandra filiformis0.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]