Talk:London Buses route 73

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


I cannot be more specific, but during the 1940s (probably earlier too) route 73 ran from wherever through Richmond to Twickenham where it took a sharp bend from York Street to London Road (the footpath was narrower then and there was a triangular island south of the roadway the 73 took) and then it went on to Hounslow. Did the 73 lose this part of its route beyond Richmond when trolleybus route 601, which turned round in the width of King Street, was replaced by motorbus 281 which carried on to Hounslow?

Popular Culture[edit]

I was watching Carry On Matron and they have an argument about the route vs the 116. Given experience on Wikipedia, (1) should we add it (2) is there a better place (3) shall we start e usual argument about what to include or not —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.103.12.173 (talk) 23:44, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I came here expecting the same - The Screwtape Letters also refers to 73 in the context of a person working at the British Library. Deryck C. 13:30, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on London Buses route 73. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]