Talk:Long drive

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Persimmon#Wood|persimmon wood]] The anchor (#Wood) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

What other prizes can be offered at an amateur golf tournament besides longest drive and closest to the pin ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.160.144.97 (talk) 06:29, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2843 yards, huh? Maybe that deserves a citation.

There should be something about "Long Drive" after the Reconstruction...

Not sure how to change the article name, but it really ought to be "long drive" rather than long driving; someone who knows how please do so.

"86 in is not 127 cm" Long drive clubs, which are always drivers, are different in many ways from consumer clubs. Until the recent club length limitation rules, the shafts were much longer than a normal 88in. (112 cm) shaft, sometimes exceeding 55 in. (140 cm). In 2005, the 86 in. (127 cm) limitation was introduced.

"this statement doesn't make sense" Clubheads usually approach the 460 cubic centimeter limit, rarely below 620cc

The article claims that some long drive golfers are PGA Tour professionals. Who? There are none that I'm aware of. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.18.136.70 (talk) 02:59, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article reads somewhat as a maketing tool for long drivers, and also uses an odd anology vs skiing and snowboarding. Much of it is opinion, not fact. --Matty art (talk) 20:48, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

seems to have been cleaned up. Ansh666 (talk) 03:52, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Allen Doyle did not make the 515yard drive in Las Vegas competition, he was 26 years old then. It was made by Mike Austin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.83.102 (talk) 02:05, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The cited reference does not say Allen Doyle made an 843 yard drive. In fact, the only references I can find for the drive cite this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llamero (talk • contribs) 19:18, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:14, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Long drive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:31, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]