Talk:Lordville–Equinunk Bridge

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state) Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Two speedy deletion notices on Lordville-Equinunk Bridge[edit]

Hello. I wanted to announce that Lordville-Equinunk Bridge has been tagged with 2 speedy deletion notices. One of them is asking for deletion as a repost (see above), and the other one is asking for deletion as pure vandalism. The vandalism notice is there along with the unreferenfed tag because all of the references appear to have been removed. Please take care of these issues ASAP as I am a bridge expert and don't like to see problems with articles about bridges on any website. 32.137.137.20 (talk) 20:17, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The speedy-deletion tags and removal of the reference were part of a sudden spate of vandalism. I have reverted the article to the last good version, and semi-protected it for a time. JohnCD (talk) 22:04, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid Article Warning[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to warn you that this appears to be an inavalid, hard-to-understand article. I have tagged the page for cleanup. If no changes are made this weekend, I will tag the page for speedy deletion per CSD A1. Thank you for your cooperation. 32.136.2.111 (talk) 00:48, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No you won't. --NE2 02:06, 10 April 2015 (UTCns/64.222.149.77|64.222.149.77]] (talk) 22:49, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

So to help this article grow, I've done a little research for sources. So far, I've found (and purchased, used), a copy of "Bridges Over the Delaware River: A History of Crossings" by Professor Frank T. Dale, which has this bridge, dated as from 1870-1903, then 1904-1986, then 1992-present, featured as chapter 22. We'll want more than this, as this chapter isn't all that juicy: no costs, no dimensions, not many pictures. - Denimadept (talk) 04:04, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple Issues[edit]

Hello. I would like to announce that I have tagged this article with multiple issues. I came to this article and noticed that it had very little content, and so I added significant content including an image to it. However, I also noticed that the single reference seemed to be invalid and so I removed it. Please either verify the reference that I removed and/or add new references to help improve this article. Also, the content of this article is still low, and so removal of any content could raise questions about CSD A3. This article requires cleanup to add content and "complete" the article. If you have any questions, please e-mail me as I am not a signed user. My address is mawong31@gmail.com. Thank you for your cooperation. 64.222.150.75 (talk) 23:40, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]