Talk:Los Angeles Tribune

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Los Angeles Tribune. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.ā€”InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:35, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Status[edit]

The LA Tribune has not been functional or in print since the 1960s. It should not be changed back to appearing as a current and active paper. It was purchased by some random company for it's name recognition despite it not being the same paper. Praxidicae (talk) 20:54, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Los Angeles Tribune (2020) and the preceding User:Justaxn/Los Angeles Tribune (2020) were declined for failure of WP:NOT, as discussed in the included Note to Reviewers. The subject might become notable if/when independent RS report on it and those references are added to the draft. Justaxn (talk) 18:09, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not notable because it's just blackhat SEO. PRAXIDICAEšŸŒˆ 18:11, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. Justaxn (talk) 18:14, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
so why did you write a draft about it, try to publish it, add it here and then revert yourself as if you hadn't created it? PRAXIDICAEšŸŒˆ 18:17, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]