Talk:Lost Springs, Wyoming

Ghost towns Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ghost towns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ghost towns on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ghost townsWikipedia:WikiProject Ghost townsTemplate:WikiProject Ghost townsGhost town articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Wyoming Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Wyoming portal This article is supported by WikiProject Wyoming.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Sex Offender Section[edit]

The number of sex offenders is significant only because it is 100% sex offenders. If everyone in New York City was a sex offender, it'd be note-worthy. Though this is a statistical anomaly, it still is an important factoid about this town. 76.167.196.217 19:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're right about one point - this is just a statistical anomaly, one of many. 100% of the inhabitants are male, 100% of them were born in the same place, 100% went to the same elementary school, etc, etc - none of these facts make the town any more notable, nor do they make the lone inhabitant notable. This is indeed an interesting coincidence - but its not encyclopedic. - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 23:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Give me a break! Interesting information is useful information. For Christ's sake, its in a category of other towns with a population of one. That is completely useless (it is) and we both only went to this article because of the unusualness of it.

I'm one to encourage such things, too, but really this is just irrelevant. 72.221.79.87 (talk) 02:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Lost Springs, Wyoming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]