Talk:Louis Pouzin

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Louis Pouzin article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Computing: Networking High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as High-importance).

France High‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Datagrams[edit]

The article currently says "This network was the first actual implementation of the pure datagram model, initially imagined and described by Donald Davies", which I don't think is the best way to put it - and may have errors.

CYCLADES was important because it was the first network to make reliability the responsibility of the hosts, not the network. This innovation was explicitly copied in TCP, as Cerf et al cheerfully acknowledge. The reference to "datagrams" is unfortunate, in my view, as it tends to disguise this key system engineering insight.

The use of the phrase 'pure datagram model' is unfortunate, as the word 'datagram' changed its meaning over time. So one shouldn't rely on use of the word 'datagram' in a historical document to mean what it does now. It was originally a synonym for 'packet'; the meaning of 'user visible network service which is not reliable' probably started to come in with UDP. The meaning of 'synonym for packet' only disappeared slowly, after that, though.

I'm not sure exactly how Davies' work differed from Baran's prior work, as it's been a long time since I read their stuff. I don't know whether Davies' original packet network used datagrams (in the modern sense) or not - but if it did, then the statement that CYCLADES was "the first actual implementation of the pure datagram model" is wrong. If it wasn't pure datagrams, but a mix, then Baran's work (which Davies cheerfully acknowledged the priority of) preceded him; and maybe the ARPANET too. (Whether Baran's network used 'pure datagrams' or not, I don't know - it may not have been designed/described in enough detail to make that determination.)

That's all part of why I feel that the best way to put Pouzin's contribution is to say that his design took the bold, innovative step of making reliability the responsibility of the hosts, not the network; this says clearly and crisply what the underlying engineering point is. It is this insight that led to the success of the internet model, and the Internet.

I don't have the energy to fix the article, though. There are a number of point I'd have to investigate (above) first. Perhaps someone else will. I will bring this question up on the internet-history mailing list, to get the views of those pioneers still with us on record. Noel (talk) 15:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]