Talk:Ludgate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gate of Lud[edit]

One citation, credited to a deceased cleric, based on the English translation of the Arabic Koran.

Hmmmm, tenuous, almost laughable.

No, there is not an "Islamic Tradition" that Christ "will encounter and defeat the Antichrist" in London. Not even tenuous, but laughable.Jimaingram 04:13, 8 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimaingram (talkcontribs)

The Tradition attributed to Muhammad is found in several authentic canonical works of Hadith, in Sahih Muslim: 'Kitab al-Fitun wa ashratus saa' [The Book of the Turmoil & Portents of the Last Hour]) by Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj Nishapuri. Also in Sunan Abu Dawood: Kitab al-Fitun [Book of Schisms] by Sulayman ibn Ash`ath Azdi Sijistani Abu Dawood, Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal by Ahmad ibn Hanbal and Jami` at-Tirmidhi by Abu `Isa Muhammad ibn `Isa at-Tirmidhi. SEMTEX85 (talk) 19:57, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ludgate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Position is wrong![edit]

Cite: "The gate stood just above a crossing of the Fleet River (this now runs underground)." That is not true! The Gate was where St. Martin's is. Right there, where the plaque is fixed. See: Ogilby and Morgan's Large Scale Map of the City As Rebuilt By 1676 online Alberich21 (talk) 09:43, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

fixed now Alberich21 (talk) 06:52, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minor alteration[edit]

The text used to say...

'According to legend Ludgate is named after King Lud. The claim by the Norman-Welsh Geoffrey of Monmouth in his Historia Regum Britanniae that the gate was named after the ancient British Lud.'

...which seems to be an awkward repetition.

I've altered it to say...

'According to legend, recorded by the Norman-Welsh cleric Geoffrey of Monmouth, Ludgate was named after the ancient British king Lud.' Axad12 (talk) 08:42, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]