Talk:Luke Hall (politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 23 May 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 05:32, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Luke Hall (politician)Luke Hall – Politician is more notable. Hatnote will suffice.[1] Unreal7 (talk) 23:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Mahveotm (talk) 09:45, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Could you please explain your reasoning? Do we not want "notable" article titles? Tony (talk) 06:03, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
5x as many views. Unreal7 (talk) 21:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per WP:TWODABS. We do not need a disambiguation page, only hatnotes, when only two articles are involved. Traffic indicates people are more often looking for the politician article, so it appears to be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. (That's not always a certain thing – there can be brief spikes in popularity of a topic, but a political election that was over three years ago is probably not such a spike).  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  15:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Political figure with with no international renown. Not WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.    Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 00:33, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, no clear primary topic. —Xezbeth (talk) 08:15, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The oppose !vote misunderstands the meaning of primary topic. A page must not reach some arbitrary threshold of renown to be the primary. It's about relativity to other pages with the same name. In this case, stats indicate a primary topic. A hatnote will resolve the TWODABS situation.--Yaksar (let's chat) 22:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose this is just not worth fussing about. For South Africans the swimmer will be more notable. Leave as a dab In ictu oculi (talk) 10:40, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.