Talk:Lumad

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Tambayan Philippines High‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2021 and 14 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Daniellesori. Peer reviewers: Jerichorajninger.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"related groups" info removed from infobox[edit]

For dedicated editors of this page: The "Related Groups" info was removed from all {{Infobox Ethnic group}} infoboxes. Comments may be left on the Ethnic groups talk page. Ling.Nut 17:15, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would just to know: Why ON EARTH are the Tasadays even included?! It's already known that they were a fake tribal group made by some guy! The descriptio even says that! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.174.236 (talk) 23:41, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible inclusion[edit]

"Mining divides Mandaya tribespeople". Inquirer.net. 2008-03-09. Retrieved 2008-03-09.

- The Mamanwa and the Manobo are embroiled in the same issue. They burned down company equipment last year, there were kidnappings of tribe members (allegedly by the mining company's security personnel) as well, demolishing of tribal houses (by the company), demands for royalty from the mining company (since the mine falls within ancestral lands apparently sold without consent by the government) which was met (I think), etc. Unfortunately I have not followed the issue closely and can not include said details into the article without a definite source of everything that's happened since a few years back.--Obsidi♠n^Soul 05:25, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some articles not included in template[edit]

The Lumad template is incomplete, I could possibly fill it out, like Subanon, which is an orphan. --Sir Jazer 13 (talk) 12:32, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Filled in everything, fixed what I could, added pictures. But they still need expanding. Each may eventually need their own articles, but unfortunately I am not an expert on them. Especially the Manobo. It's weird how the largest group of the Lumads, and the most well-documented do not have their own article. I might make one in the future.--Obsidi♠n^Soul 07:41, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Need more information on other tribes[edit]

I have filled in what I can in the article. But it still needs more information of other tribes not mentioned in it (e.g. The Talaandig). It's a bit confusing since other tribes are sometimes considered part of a larger group (like the largest ethnolinguistic group, the Manobo, which can be subdivided into tribes like the Bagobo and the Atta, who despite speaking the same linguistic family, consider themselves distinct from the Manobo). Anyway, please help fill in the article. Some may eventually need their own articles as well.--Obsidi♠n^Soul 00:05, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lumads affected by insurgency[edit]

Insurgency of the Communist Party of the Philippines

http://www.arkibongbayan.org/2009/2009-08-Aug31-militarizationofLumads/militarization%20of%20lumads.htm

Lumads and human rights[edit]

http://www.iidnet.org/midsayap-declaration-of-indigenous-peoples-in-mindanao/

http://www.aippnet.org/home/daily-sharing/1080-philippines-mindanao-peasants-and-indigenous-peoples-in-manila-call-to-stop-killings-and-large-scale-mining

http://www.aippnet.org/home/daily-sharing/1233-mindanao-lumads-poverty-worsened-not-unchanged-for-indigenous-peoples

http://www.philippines.hvu.nl/mindanao2.htm

Rajmaan (talk) 19:42, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures[edit]

Sobano

http://www.postcardman.net/37638.jpg

Bagobo

http://exhibits.slpl.org/scanned/deriv2/LPE00179.jpg

http://exhibits.slpl.org/scanned/deriv2/LPE05175.jpg

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.everyculture.com/East-Southeast-Asia/Bagobo.html and likely others. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:27, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lumad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Lumad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lumad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:58, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]