Talk:Luna bar

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 April 2012. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Proposed deletion[edit]

I'd suggest this gets merged and/or redirected to Clif Bar, per WP:PRODUCT. Valfontis (talk) 17:35, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NUTRITIONAL INFORMATION=[edit]

Hmm, a wikipedia page about a "nutrition bar" without nutrition information -- or ingredients list -- might as well delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.51.144.118 (talk) 08:55, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

With 20+ varieties, it is not possible to list the varying ingredients and varying nutritional information. If, however, reliable sources discuss either or both -- "LUNA bars have a lot/very little ingredient X compared to similar products" or "LUNA bars tend to be very high/low in nutrient Y" -- we can certainly add something.

Keeping or deleting the article should hinge on whether or not there is substantial coverage in independent reliable sources about the product (see WP:N). - SummerPhD (talk) 21:26, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]