Talk:Lunar eclipse
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lunar eclipse article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Fall 2014. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Cornell University/Online Communities (Fall 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 3 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 28, 2004 and March 3, 2007. |
Semi-protected edit request on 11 May 2022[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The page mentions two conditions for a lunar eclipse to occur: syzygy and a full moon. In fact, if the first condition holds (syzygy with the Earth between the moon and the sun), the moon is necessarily full *and* the moon is at/near the ecliptic (i.e., near a lunar node). The mention of the full moon as an additional condition without mentioning the lunar nodes/ecliptic is confusing and leaves out key information for someone trying to fully understand why and when lunar eclipses happen.
I suggest the following revised wording for the second sentence: "This can occur only when the Sun, Earth, and Moon are exactly or very closely aligned (in syzygy) with Earth between the other two, which can happen only on the night of a full moon when the moon is near either lunar node." [link to Lunar_node] Ixnayamenay (talk) 09:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Done, that is better. ◢ Ganbaruby! (talk) 06:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
my idea on the refrakted color of the earthshadow[edit]
i made a picture to the genesis of the colors in the earthshadow as seen on the moon . i think i can see a blue line at the border of shadow , coming from upper-atmosphere-refraktion stronger affecting to blue light . i would also say there must be a black part between the border and the beginning red center shadow , and too there should be a blueisch or green center in the shadow . i find the animated gif-picture in " blood moon "-paragraph somewhat displaying what i mean . my picture (it is free): [img]https://up.picr.de/44273482wf.jpg[/img]. sure its no solid sience of mine , but maybe of interest .--Konfressor (talk) 23:55, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Eye safety--absurd statement[edit]
The article says it's safe to look at an eclipse of the Moon without eye protection because it is less bright than the full Moon. But that seems a bit silly, since it's perfectly safe to look at the full Moon. Uporządnicki (talk) 11:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yes. I have removed that wording. Thanks for bringing this up. HiLo48 (talk) 22:52, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Team-B-Vital Improvement Drive[edit]
Hello all!
This article has been chosen as this fortnight's effort for WP:Discord's #team-b-vital channel, a collaborative effort to bring Vital articles up to a B class if possible, similar to WP:Articles for Improvement. This effort will run for up to a fortnight, ending early if the article is felt to be at B-class or impossible to further improve. Articles are chosen by a quick vote among interested chatters, with the goal of working together on interesting Vital articles that need improving.
Thank you!Remagoxer (talk) 00:21, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
The earth is not flat[edit]
During a lunar eclipse, the Earth passes between the moon and the sun. When that happens, the sun projects Earth’s shadow onto the moon. When this happens, you can actually see the Earth’s shadow if you look up at the moon. If you do this, you’ll see that there is a round shadow, not a flat one. 2001:16A2:7A90:C000:4179:4598:2CFF:56EE (talk) 14:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 4 June 2023[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the "Occurrence" section the language is vauge:
At least two lunar eclipses and as many as five occur every year, although total lunar eclipses are significantly less common.
Should be changed to
At least two lunar eclipses and as many as five occur every year, although total lunar eclipses are significantly less common than partial lunar eclipses. Cnich43 (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: You are autoconfirmed now after making this request, do it yourself. Lightoil (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- @User:Cnich43 Well, I couldn't say whether it was "vauge" or not, but it certainly wasn't vague. It was just plain incorrect. Uporządnicki (talk) 14:55, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Physical sciences
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Physical sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
- C-Class Astronomy articles
- Top-importance Astronomy articles
- C-Class Astronomy articles of Top-importance
- C-Class Moon articles
- Top-importance Moon articles
- Moon task force articles
- C-Class Solar System articles
- High-importance Solar System articles
- Solar System task force
- C-Class Eclipses articles
- Top-importance Eclipses articles
- Eclipses task force
- Lunar eclipse articles
- C-Class physics articles
- Mid-importance physics articles
- C-Class physics articles of Mid-importance
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report
- Selected anniversaries (October 2004)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2007)