Talk:Lunenburg, Nova Scotia

Canada: Nova Scotia / Geography / Communities / The 10,000 Challenge C‑class Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Nova Scotia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.
	This article was created or improved during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada, which started in November 2016 and is ongoing. You can help!!

Protected areas Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

World Heritage Sites (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles

Untitled[edit]

Shouldn`t this article have an ``Infobox Settlement``, like all of the other Nova Scotian towns —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.73.161.207 (talk) 20:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lunenburg, Nova Scotia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:07, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lunenburg, Nova Scotia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:01, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lunenburg, Nova Scotia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130918060905/http://museum.gov.ns.ca/fma/en/home/default.aspx to http://museum.gov.ns.ca/fma/en/home/default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested improvements[edit]

Demographics needs update to 2016.
Dialect doesn't need its own section.
A lot of the images are also on linked pages e.g. Raid on Lunenburg. Not that they're not good imgs it's just there are too many and some should go.
lot of references should be improved, e.g. refs to archive.org need something current; pretty sure Peter Landry is self-published. Refs to Bell aren't done properly. Bare URLs need fixing.
References section should not have a subsection called Texts, it should be in a further reading section. Actually it's probably redundant.
External links should not have a lengthy Biographies subsection, they should be used as references.
it should be made explicitly clear what is the difference between this article and Lunenburg County, Nova Scotia and Municipality of the District of Lunenburg, that's rather confusing.
there's very little about geography, government, sports, education, infrastructure as there usually is in such an article. There's a lot that could be said about the architecture and why it's a UNESCO town.
The history section is given undue weight and detail compared to the rest of the article. Nothing wrong with historical info, but a lot of what's in this article is covered elsewhere in Wikipedia such as Lunenburg Campaign (1758), Raid on Lunenburg, Nova Scotia (1756), Raid on Lunenburg, Nova Scotia (1782), Foreign Protestants, Father Le Loutre's War, Military history of the Mi’kmaq people, Military history of the Acadians, Gorham's Rangers etc. etc. etc. At the moment the history reads like a laundry list of events rather than a narrative. Suggest cutting back some of the WP:CONTENTFORKING. --Cornellier (talk) 21:18, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lunenburg in German Wikipedia[edit]

Hi everyone; I recognized that the article on Lunenburg in the German WP is...well... Coming from Lueneburg Cty in Germany, I am not really happy with that. I am going to try to change that. I will start with a verbally translation of this site for whatever facts are not in the German WP. so, just to not step on anyones toes (insert Canadian flag here) I would love to receive any arguments that would tell me that this is not OK. (Oh, BTW, I DO know about the commons license...but doesn't hurt to ask) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lost Boy (talk • contribs) 18:33, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wait wut. What are you proposing? There's something you don't like about this ? --Cornellier (talk) 21:46, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]