Talk:Luton Town F.C.–Watford F.C. rivalry

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Bedfordshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bedfordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bedfordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BedfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject BedfordshireTemplate:WikiProject BedfordshireBedfordshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hertfordshire (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hertfordshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HertfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject HertfordshireTemplate:WikiProject HertfordshireHertfordshire articles

Honours and achievements[edit]

I've thought about this long and hard (given that I definitely have a conflict of interest here). But I eventually came to the conclusion that the Football League Trophy had to be removed. Otherwise, we would surely have to include the respective club's second, third and fourth division achievements, total number of league titles, probably the third division south cup... it would just start getting ridiculous. WFC (talk) 01:25, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I originally had it in there on the proviso that "both teams had entered it", but on reflection I think you're probably right for the reasons that you have given. Off it comes. – Cliftonian^{the orangey bit} 06:38, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm happy enough for it to be mentioned in the prose though. While us Hornets knock it, it's probably one of the four or five most significant things to happen this century (along with that League Cup encounter, the draw that got us into the playoffs, and said playoffs themselves). WFC (talk) 14:10, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But does it really have anything to do with the rivalry? I say leave it out: as I see it, it isn't really relevant apart from as part of a table of honours. – Cliftonian^{the orangey bit} 14:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I'm not going to complain ;) WFC (talk) 15:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Luton Town F.C.–Watford F.C. rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]