Talk:Lydia Canaan/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 15:00, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi there! I'm Cartoon network freak and I'm here to inform you that I reviewed this article and failed it (✗ Fail) due to multiple reasons. The lead should not contain any references as it should be a summary of all content featured in the article's body, which is already sourced. The whole article shows up overdosed fancruft ("rock star" etc...), which isn't supported for GA status. At least 40% of the references in the article are both not reliable and not formatted, including REFs 19-23, REFs 30, 31 and my more. Additionally, one link is dead and a few others show fellow problems. As for the prose, the article's body is over-arranged with images; a high amount of them are overfluous to include. While there's enough information in this article, many of its passages show basic grammar errors or are simply wrongly worded.
In order to achieve this article to GA status, I suggest you taking it to a peer review and see what other users suggest you to do. Additionally, you should try to find reliable sources, especially for music releases, not unreliable MP3 download sites. However, don't be discourged; I also started like this, even worse 
, one year ago on Wikipedia. If you have any question concerning editing or moving forwards with this, you may ask me or any other user (we won't bite you :)) But as the article stands now, it is an immediate fail.