Talk:Lyon Park Historic District

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lyon Park Historic District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120926195857/http://www.dhr.virginia.gov/registers/Counties/Arlington/South_Arlington_20101005.pdf to http://www.dhr.virginia.gov/registers/Counties/Arlington/South_Arlington_20101005.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This sentence in the article is unclear, and probably inaccurate: "It contains 1,165 contributing buildings and 1 contributing site in a residential neighborhood in South Arlington." All of Clarendon is in North Arlington, so unless it means that there buildings or a site in South Arlington, adjacent to Clarendon, that somehow contribute to Clarendon, which is in North Arlington, the statement is inaccurate. I do not quite understand the use of "contributing" in the context of the article. If it means the buildings and the sites are in Clarendon, then the sentence should have "North" not "South" Arlington in it. I also think the word "contributing" needs to be clarified or changed, and additionally it should be explained what exactly the "1 contributing site" is. Perhaps the use of "contributing" refers to paying dues to the Lyon Park Association, but that is certainly not mentioned in the article. I would be happy to make an edit, but I don't understand the original intention behind the sentence. --HenryPurcell (talk) 19:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have now also added a link to the Wikipedia article on Contributing Properties, but if this is not the intended usage in the article, please feel free to revert this link. --HenryPurcell (talk) 19:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]