Talk:M-221 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Starstriker7^(Talk) 23:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

I will review this article. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 23:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   People from Michigan probably won't know what a state trunkline highway is. I count myself among that group. Can you define it briefly?

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Is it possible to acquire an image of the highway? If not, that's alright, although it seems like something that seems worthy of adding.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Just two comments to address, no biggie. Once you do, this article should be good to go. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 23:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Replies

1. The term is defined by way of the link in the first sentence. This has been acceptable in 7 FAs and 100 other GAs already.
2. No freely available images have been found, and I live 5–6 hours away from that part of the state. Sorry, but we're out of luck in the photo department for now.

Thank you for the review! Imzadi 1979 → 23:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Alright, thank you for the clarifications and replies. This article looks ready to pass! --Starstriker7^(Talk) 23:54, 20 May 2011 (UTC)