Talk:M. C. Escher/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 18:03, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am quickfailing this. Please review WP:WIAGA. Note that the WP:LEAD should summarize the entire article. I suggest including at least a one sentence summary of each subsequent section. Most paragraphs that I looked at had no inline citations. Please refer to WP:CITE regarding sourcing.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:03, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the lead is a bit short. However, per WP:WIAGA inline citations are needed for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged. I don't see any such points in the article that have not been addressed with inline citations. De728631 (talk) 01:04, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]