Talk:MAC address anonymization

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as Mid-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Merger proposal[edit]

Is it worth merging this with Tracking? They're very similar, and this could easily be covered as a category within tracking. Cyberjacob (talk) 09:22, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non Standard MAC Address in the Example[edit]

A valid MAC should be in the format of 11:22:33:44:55:66 (48 bits) rather than 11:22:33:44:55 in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.144.20.34 (talk) 02:03, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, fixed. Widefox; talk 18:23, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism and copyright violation[edit]

this edit talks about "the previous chapter", which is a strong indicator that it was plagiarized wholesale from a non-free-content source. Uncle G (talk) 10:09, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]