Talk:MEL Magazine

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 5 January 2021 by reviewer Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs).

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Alyssabcarroll (talk · contribs) has been paid by MEL Magazine.

Request Update[edit]

It closed again - July 2022 sometime. Here's a source, don't know how great it is. But someone who's good at all this could maybe update this article again to put it in the past tense? Thanks! -- AIW https://observer.com/2022/07/mel-magazine-lays-off-its-staff-again/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.200.0.112 (talk) 18:23, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request to Edit Source Quote[edit]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

The second sentence of the current page states as follows: Funded by Dollar Shave Club, New York Times journalist Amanda Hess described Mel as a "less serious publication for men that doesn't enforce male stereotypes".

The source does not contain that exact quote.

The source material states: “Mel is the rare men’s magazine that has taken upon itself to investigate masculinity, not enforce it.“

I’d like to request that an editor correct the content of the quote to reflect what the source said.

Pinging @JSFarman:, who was involved in the page at Articles for Creation. Alyssabcarroll (talk) 21:25, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. That's a no-brainer. Correcting an obviously incorrect quote is non-controversial and anyone can do it, COI or not. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:32, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No adverts?[edit]

Every article is basically endless scroll of spammy adverts… 79.66.75.248 (talk) 04:08, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]