Talk:MIT App Inventor

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Android Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Android, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Android and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AndroidWikipedia:WikiProject AndroidTemplate:WikiProject AndroidAndroid articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Google Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

Past tense[edit]

Is there any reason why the entire article should be in the past sense? The fact that Google has abandoned App Inventor doesn't mean it no longer exists. It's being officially continued by the MIT. Jimmy Fleischer (talk) 22:11, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I'm going to rename it too. Espertus (talk) 20:51, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edits by User:MCP9843[edit]

For one, the statement that was reverted was simply false. Will Dormann made no such claim about App Inventor's source code (or any source code, in fact). His claim is about Android apps. Secondly, on the face of it, the statement doesn't really cohere as written. If App Inventor has crypto keys in its source code, what danger is that supposed to indicate? Thirdly, the claim that the secrets issue is connected to the virus-scanners' false positives also doesn't cohere and is provided without any explanation or documentation. Finally, this does not appear to be a widespread or significant criticism of App Inventor, or at least no evidence was given of such and it seems as if this could have simply been dealt with as a bug report.

Add[edit]

Computer 106.76.238.221 (talk) 14:49, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

that what i am saying hacker attack 37.24.149.170 (talk) 12:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]