Talk:ML Fairness
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Expanding this article[edit]
After whistleblowing the fact that Google imposes it's own political agenda that reflects in search results, suppressing others', merits it's own article AND a mention of this in Google's own article! Search for Project Veritas revealing what ML Fairness is really about. It's scary, it's biased, and Wikipedia is better than this; we should show that. - User talk: A Jolly Nurgle Prick 11:52 (UTC+1), 14 july 2019.
Probably should just be merged; doesn't appear to merit its own article. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 15:30, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- I think there may be enough sources to establish notability for this as a separate topic. A quick search suggests that other organizations have considered the issue of fairness in machine learning, and for at least a few years (examples: http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~madras/presentations/fairness-ml-uaig.pdf https://2021.ai/fairness-in-machine-learning/). AFAICT "ML Fairness" is not a trademark and it doesn't seem to be specifically associated with Google, but rather the whole term is merely the sum of its parts. 76.70.105.28 (talk) 21:40, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- There is a separate article called Fairness (machine learning). I work for Google AI and have no idea what this article is about.2620:15C:48:200:EA28:B454:314D:E63F (talk) 19:34, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- This page should be just redirected to Fairness (machine learning). The title is generic and has nothing exclusively to do with any single organization. 147.161.131.10 (talk) 07:06, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- There is a separate article called Fairness (machine learning). I work for Google AI and have no idea what this article is about.2620:15C:48:200:EA28:B454:314D:E63F (talk) 19:34, 5 February 2020 (UTC)