Talk:MODX

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 January 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

[Untitled][edit]

I've updated the article to include more references, external recognition and a more consistent tone. Additional updates that can be added later are included in comments in the entry. What other updates should be added to ensure the article meets Wikipedia inclusion guidelines? Rthrash (talk) 12:57, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request: International communities please register your links to your native language support sites here 99.181.55.142 (talk) 23:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why does linking to Youtube searches for "MODx" trigger a bot revert of the edit? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rthrash (talk • contribs) 00:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this entry held to a different standard than other Content Management Systems? Removal of marketing and vanity elements makes sense for article neutrality, wholesale removal of content seems as if driven by personal agenda and not the TOS for Wikipedia. If you look at Content Management System Joomla! or Drupal the standards seem to differ for what may be included. Jaygilmore (talk) 13:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[[User:16x9] please explain what makes the references here here "bad stuff"? If the formatting or reference conventions is inappropriate would a more appropriate course of action be to correct the formatting rather than a wholesale deletion of the content which provides notable information from reliable sources? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rthrash (talk • contribs) 14:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was either WP:OR or vanity. 16x9 (talk) 19:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do definitely feel like this article lacks a basic section about how ModX works. Like in a drupal article, I would talk about views and content types. In a ModX article, I might talk about snippets and chunks, but I don't know enough about ModX yet to do that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.240.74.46 (talk) 15:25, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MODX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080116233315/http://www.packtpub.com/article/modx-wins-most-promising-open-source-cms to http://www.packtpub.com/article/modx-wins-most-promising-open-source-cms

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:26, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MODX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140203043053/http://awards.cmscritic.com/past-winners/ to http://awards.cmscritic.com/past-winners/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]