Talk:MOL (company)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neeile = Neelie[edit]

Minor typo should be corrected together with a working link. Thanks. 80.83.157.139 (talk) 15:55, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming[edit]

Could we move this page to MOL (company)? Although MOL Magyar Olaj- és Gázipari Nyrt. is an official name of the company, this name is not widely used in English. WP:UCN states that the most common name what verifiable reliable sources in English call the subject should be used. It also states that page names should be as simple as possible. The most common name for this company is MOL. As we have the disambiguation page Mol and MOL redirects to Mol, the article should be renamed MOL (company). Beagel (talk) 12:02, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note Since no one has objected, I have moved it.--Aervanath (talk) 04:45, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Primary sources[edit]

This article lays heavily on primary sources. However, per WP:RS more third party reliable sources are needed. Beagel (talk) 17:37, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on MOL Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"placed 402 on the Fortune Global 500 list of the world's largest companies in 2013 with a revenue equal to one fifth of Hungary's GDP at the time"[edit]

Extremely doubtful and suspicious, somebody's calculation is wrong. Hungary is not an oil rich country like Russia or the Saudis such that just one company could claim 20% of the annual GDP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4C4E:24A5:B00:E2F3:66FC:6E00:ED7A (talk) 20:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sections with subjective wording in tone of an advertisement[edit]

I take issue with the wording of multiple parts of the article. There seems to be an extensive use of subjective terms in praise of the company ("leading", "state-of-the-art") as well as, for some reason, descriptions of the company's vague plans into the future, which seem highly irrelevant: "...to prepare the company for times beyond the fuel age, the company has set the goal to become a broader goods and services provider" This isn't a press briefing. If such statements are to be had in an encyclopaedia entry, they need to be, at the very least, detailed and specific actions or steps of the company should be noted. Or something.

I will do my best to remove parts I consider problematic but I cannot help but feel much of the article needs to be reviewed for truthfulness. — Soggy Pandas (talk) 01:19, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]