Talk:Madonna (book)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: -- Cirt (talk) 13:33, 21 May 2011 (UTC) I will review this article. -- Cirt (talk) 13:33, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Successful good article nomination[edit]
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of May 21, 2011, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Writing quality is pretty good — I did a bit of copyediting, but more is needed. I would recommend Peer Review, and seeking out input from previously uninvolved editors. Key points to ask about for copyeditors to focus on include overusage of commas, leading to run-on sentences, or just overly long sentences. Also, dup words used in some places. Passes here.
- 2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout. Nice formatting. ;) Passes here.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Yes, it is indeed thorough, covers major aspects of the publication. One minor point going forward: I suggest expanding the Summary sect, and changing its name to Contents. Passes here.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Neutral tone throughout. Passes here.
- 5. Article stability? Upon inspection of article edit history and talk page history, no outstanding issues. Passes here.
- 6. Images?: One image used, fair use book cover, appropriate fair use rationale on image page. Passes here.
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— -- Cirt (talk) 14:24, 21 May 2011 (UTC)