Talk:Magnepan

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

I don't think the use of the word "legendary," in this context, is appropriate in an encyclopedia article. I do think that a description of the company's reputation with consumers is relevant, but the language used should remain neutral. I'm removing it.

While I personally prefer electrostatic loudspeakers, the word "legendary" correctly describes the status of certain speakers and companies among consumers, notably Magnepan, Quad, etc. Zuiram 12:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then let me clarfiy. I don't think the use of the word "legendary," in this context, is appropriate in an encyclopedia article without a citation. I don't think a claim like that can go unsupported, especially when it's in the opening sentence of the article.Supergyro2k 23:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaned up a few tech details.

```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esande (talk • contribs) 10:09, 16 January 2010 (UTC) It is still weak. I am working on it though.[reply]

```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esande (talk • contribs) 06:35, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar, added information that Magnepan is a private company, grammar, etc.

```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esande (talk • contribs) 05:50, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]