Talk:Majid Khan (detainee)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Another innocent country boy picked up by evil Amerika and falsely imprisoned in the Guantanamo death star. Yes. I like the touch about the hip-hop music. Kevinp2 05:32, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Labeling the CCR as a left-wing group, without providing a verifiable, authoritztive source does not comply with WP:NPOV. Please try to comply with the WP:NPOV.
Cheers! Geo Swan 17:04, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bot report : Found duplicate references ![edit]

In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)

  • "Csm061006" :
    • Khan's appeal points out that even though he has been in US custody for more than three and a half years, he has never had any kind of review of the legality of his detention.<ref name=Csm061006> [http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1006/p01s03-uspo.html New lawsuits challenge Congress's detainee act], ''[[Christian Science Monitor]]'', [[October 6]] [[2006]]
    • [http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1006/p01s03-uspo.html New lawsuits challenge Congress's detainee act], ''[[Christian Science Monitor]]'', [[October 6]] [[2006]]

DumZiBoT (talk) 08:55, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous edits from Guantanamo...[edit]

An edit here was made by a DoD IP address, User:130.22.190.5: [1]. An adjacent IP address, User:130.22.190.10 just said he was a current Guantanamo guard, so I believe these edits were also made by someone at Guantanamo.

I am to ask, generally, for good faith editors from the DoD to identify themselves as such.

The location of that user is confirmed at User talk:130.22.190.5. Supertouch (talk) 12:44, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 14:37, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

explanation[edit]

Another contributor excised an image from this article, with the edit summary "remove copyrighted pic, just because we haven't found one yet is no excuse to use someone else's work". The families of various Guantanamo captives have done what they could to draw the public's attention to the cases of those captives, including distributing photos of those captives. Majid Khan's family have done what they could on his behalf. His father submitted an affidavit. They were barred from attending his hearings, because they weren't yet US citizens. They are refugees, who have been legal residents of the USA for the last fifteen years or so. They were warned that if they traveled to Guantanamo they would probably not be readmitted to the USA.

A suggestion that Khan's family want distribution of this image restricted, in order to make a profit, strikes me as far-fetched.

I am going to request a discussion of this image at the fair use discussion forum. I request the exciser leave the image and participate in that discussion. Geo Swan (talk) 02:29, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion is underway at WP:NFCR#File:Family photo of Majid Khan, in 1999.jpg. Input from editors familiar with this situation would be appreciated. VernoWhitney (talk) 03:58, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://harpers.org/archive/2009/11/the-intelligence-factory/5/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 00:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Majid Khan (detainee). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:45, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Majid Khan (detainee). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:28, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Majid Khan (detainee). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Majid Khan (detainee). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:42, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Any update on this one?[edit]

Most of the details in this article are from over 10 years ago; on a cursory look, the most recent update about him seems to be from 2014. Has nothing happened in his case since then? Robofish (talk) 00:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and anybody can edit the article to reflect the latest info. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 04:35, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]