Talk:Malcolm Grant

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeMalcolm Grant was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 29, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 27, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that professor Malcolm Grant, the Provost and President of University College London, agreed to shave off his moustache if UCL students raised £1500 for Comic Relief, on Red Nose Day in 2005?

Christmas Day Bomber UCL Links - Grant's Defence[edit]

Is no one going to talk about his ludicrous defence of his own absurd policy of allowing racists and preachers of hate at ISOC, as so well documented by Douglas Murray?

Or does that not fit with the priorities of the Cultural Marxists which generally infest these kind of articles and issues on Leftypedia.

Writing in the Evening Standard, Murray said that: Imagine that a society at a London university invites a well-known racist to address its members. The following week, the same thing happens; the week after, they get two KKK members to debate each other. A number of these speakers are known to be avowed admirers of the convicted London nail-bomber David Copeland. Sometime later, one of the heads of this charming society attempts a nail-bombing spree in a direct copy of Copeland's crimes. The details of this young man's student activities come to light. It transpires that people had repeatedly warned the university that this would happen. The press starts to ask how such poisonous people could preach hate on campus. The university's provost responds. First he announces that it is his critics who are the problem and that opponents of white-supremacist bombers are “prejudiced”. He then gives a front-page interview to the Standard explaining that universities “must let” white-racist nail-bomb advocates speak on campus. All you have to do is exchange white racists for Islamist fanatics, and “prejudice” for “Islamophobia” and you have exactly the degraded position of University College London provost Malcolm Grant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.35.177 (talk) 04:17, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hail victory —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.35.177 (talk) 04:22, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

provost order[edit]

Should the "as provost" section be in chronological order? It makes more sense that way in my opinion. Privong 01:26, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to edit into chronological order.LordHarris 12:30, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done Privong 19:35, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

I've removed Image:Malcolm Grant.jpg, as it's unfree. There should be no problem at all getting a photo of him - he's a recognizable, high-profile figure at a public institution - and as such this is easily replaceable; note the criteria that no free equivalent is available or could be created. There's certainly nothing remarkable about this image that means we have to use it to pass commentary on the photograph itself...

I've left the moustachless photo further down in the article, though - free though it is, it doesn't quite seem right to use it as the main image! Shimgray | talk | 13:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that he is a high profile figure and if someone uploads a free image than all the better. However there isnt one available now and putting up an image required photo is not likely to get someone to wait outside his office in the vain effort of snapping a pic at him. I have been at UCL for three years and have NEVER seen the provost and I frequent the main building quite a bit! LordHarris 13:32, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
How odd - I saw the VC several times whilst at Durham, and could get in touch at short notice with someone who'd see him within a couple of weeks... different environments, I guess. Anyhow, I've found a rather well-executed CC-BY-NC licensed image on flickr - and have emailed the author to see if they'd be willing to relicense it. Shimgray | talk | 20:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok that would be a good solution, good thinking. He has an office, guarded by granite Koptos Lions at UCL, its not very welcoming. LordHarris 22:14, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done! One down, one million to go... Shimgray | talk | 22:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thats a great photo, good job! LordHarris 23:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio[edit]

Born in New Zealand in 1947, Professor Grant was awarded the LLB (1970), LLM (1973) and LLD (1986) by the Otago University, New Zealand. He then immigrated to England in 1986. The above is a copyright violation from: here, without a thorough look, I'm not sure if there is not more. Aboutmovies 07:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This isnt copyvio as the words are not all the same - they have not been copied exactbut have been rewritten - the information is the same, but the prose is not. More over, the above is linked several times in the article. LordHarris 12:40, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Born in New Zealand in 1947, Professor Grant was awarded the LLB (1970), LLM (1973) and LLD (1986) by the University of Otago, New Zealand.from here
Other than the university name it is exactly the same including punctuation. It does not matter if it is linked. It needs to be quoted and cited if you use more than a few words in a row.
Professor Grant was awarded the CBE in 2003 for services to planning law and local government.
This is also a copyvio as not quoted, and the citation for it is not the above mentioned webste. Aboutmovies 16:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Rewritten and reference added. LordHarris 12:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA assessment – on hold [edit]

Thank you for nominating this article as one that may meet the Good Article Criteria. As you will see I have put this article on hold at this time.

I note that the article is generally well written and that it should be able to pass GA in the allotted time if the adjustments detailed below are made (or if you disagree then please let me know for each point).

I normally also suggest that as each adjustment is made, that editors place the template {{done}} after each part that is completed as this will provide all editors with a guide of what is completed in this fashion. Done

  1. There seems to be a problem with part of the info-box which will require fixing. checkY Done SeveroTC 12:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Where possible set up appropriate wiki-links for the first occurrence of the following words or abbreviations (eg: lld – Doctor of Laws) and also for any other important words such as (there are a number I have not included here which could do with linking): llb; llm; spinal repair; women’s health; £;
  3. These two sentences are a little choppy – particularly in terms of the way they conjoin - and only just make a paragraph. I would suggest a little rewriting, and some expansion or combining with other parts in that section (In August, 2003, Grant left the University of Cambridge and become Provost and President of University College London.[8] It is a role equivalent to Vice-Chancellor at other United Kingdom universities.)
  4. The article uses two ways of expressing currency such as (generate 300 million pounds) and (£50 million). I suggest the choice of the latter throughout the document.
  5. Have a look at the quotes in the document and adjust to meet this guideline please: Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Quotations_in_italics
  6. The start of these two sentences is POV (unfortunately?) and the sentences are a little choppy in terms of meeting encyclopaedic standards. (Unfortunately for his moustache — of 33 years — students and staff duly donated over £2,000.[12] However, it has since regrown.)
  7. Choose Professor Grant or Malcolm Grant, or Grant as your descriptor throughout the article.
  8. Sorry having read this whole part I think it needs to be rewritten to encyclopaedic standards and to meet criteria 1 at WP:GAC:
    (To gather additional funding for UCL, Grant has led UCL's attempt to reduce any increase in staff expenditure. In 2004 and 2005 this encountered protest from several members of the academic and support staff at the university.[13] This was part of the wider call for pay increases across UK universities by the Association of University Teachers (AUT). A partial boycott threatened UCL, although this was later resolved by a minor increase in pay.[14]In 2006 he was against the Israel university boycotts. [15] In 2006 Grant also controversially stated that European students had better English skills than many British students.[16][17]In 2007, Professor Grant said the achievement and academic gap between male and female students was widening. [18] Since 1998, 313,259 more women than men have made university applications. Malcolm Grant said, "the trend indicated a big fall in the number of university-educated men".[19]In January 2007 he argued that the entire nation-wide university approach to funding needed a different approach. [20] In regards to UCL's need for additional funding he stated the reasons in an interview with the BBC:)
  • Please spend the appropriate amount of time on getting this ready and after you finish (and are totally happy with the content following a careful proof-read) please let me know and I will reassess – and it will most probably pass. As always the system gives you 2 – 7 days to achieve these adjustments but in some extraordinary circumstances a few extra days can be made available. Please let me know directly on my talk page if you need that extra time. Also if you have any other questions please come to my talk page and I will try my best to answer or assist. Cheers --VS talk 03:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Perhaps an update is needed on his performance as Chair of the NHS(E) Commissioning Board?Delahays (talk) 09:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Malcolm Grant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:15, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Malcolm_Grant&oldid=1206142879"