Talk:Man of the House (2005 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Women's sport Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Are the 2 films unrelated, or was the newer one inspired by the older one? --SuperDude 02:20, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The anwers are No and No. TDT . July 25, 2005.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Man of the House (2005 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101107185850/http://manofthehouse.com/blog/editors-blog/me-and-tommy-lee-jones to http://manofthehouse.com/blog/editors-blog/me-and-tommy-lee-jones

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Worst[edit]

"one of the worst films ever set in Texas" [1]

I might try and fit this into the article later. -- 109.76.210.200 (talk) 21:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This movie is awesome. Whoever said that is a blithering idiot, along with all the critics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.241.240.42 (talk) 02:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia[edit]

The External links section included a link to Manofthehouse.com an online magazine for men and dads. It is not relevant to this film, but because it is irrelevant and it shares the name of this film they did a review of this film anyway to take advantage of search engines. Vaguely amusing at best. I have removed it from the article because it is irrelevant.[2] -- 109.76.210.200 (talk) 21:44, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]