Talk:Manager Tools Podcast

Podcasting Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Jose ramonmt (talk · contribs) / Manager Tools Podcast This user has contributed to the article.

Original Research tag[edit]

According to Wikipedia:No original research: "The term "original research" (OR) is used on Wikipedia to refer to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist." All the informations which are presented in the article have been published by Manager Tools so they do not present Original Research and the tag should be removed. However, although the references have been improved to include more secondary sources, the related tag Wikipedia:PRIMARY#Primary.2C secondary and tertiary_sources should probably be kept for now as most references are still a primary source. Mctechuciztecatl (talk) 14:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article is written like an ad for the podcast. Much of the writing seems as if it was lifted from the podcast website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.17.126.145 (talk) 03:20, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is quite a few external references. Any suggestions for improvement? - 195.173.198.90 (talk) 14:01, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability tag[edit]

According to Wikipedia:Notability_(web)#Criteria: "The website or content has won a well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization.[6]". The multiple Podcast Awards wins should qualify this podcast for notability. Macko74 (talk) 13:23, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed with Macko74 Mctechuciztecatl (talk) 10:52, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements?[edit]

How can we improve it? We removed the external links, can you give more suggestions? thank You— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jose ramonmt (talk • contribs) 18:18, 31 October 2012

The tone is too chatty, the references are not independent enough, the article lifts content that appears elsewhere without making it clear that the content has been quoted thus making that content a copyright violation. I suggest you consult some of the articles in Wikipedia Good Articles for examples of well-written, well-sourced Wikipedia articles and try to make this article resemble them. Shearonink (talk) 20:21, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Shearonink for your help. I did some changes. Removed some information to make it more neutral. Removed external links and added quotes and citations. Made it less chatty. Questions. How can I add more citations? The podcasts relies on what we the listeners say so not so much external references and that is why is based on primary sources. Suggestions? Thank you for your help. Have a great day. --Jose ramonmt (talk) 18:28, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, you provide a lot of detailed explanations of products, which is the reason for the "ad" tag at the top. Trim down the product descriptions, and that should help tremendously. Also, for citations, can you find more newspaper articles or TV news network website articles? Those would help the citations. If you need more help, feel free to reopen this by removing the {{tl}} template at the top and replacing it with {{Help me}}. Thanks! gwickwire | Leave a message 19:46, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Gwickwire for your help and advices. I trimed product descriptions and removed some other information that could be seen as an ad. Also I searched for new citations and found some like Colleges in which host have done talks and some blogs and pages where the podcast is recommended and other citations like iTunes comments. No TV news websites articles or newspapers yet found. Could you give other options? or suggestions. Thank you! Have a great day!. Jose ramonmt (talk) 17:42, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good, but that may have not been enough. Tsar Rostov (talk) 21:26, 2 November 2023 (EST)

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hi, I Did some changes and added new sources. Can you please tell me what can I do so the tags at the top can be removed? Thank You. Jose ramonmt (talk) 16:49, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quick answer; solve the issues and remove the tags. Long answer; ensure that it doesn't read as promotional and use sources unrelated (i.e. those without a positive or negative) conflict of interest interest and then remove the tags when its felt that the issues have been resolved. If you need any more help please replace the {{Help me}} tag. --wintonian ^talk 18:57, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.discprofile.com/whatisdisc.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Vectro (talk) 14:37, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also removed copyrighted material from http://www.manager-tools.com/docs/Horstmans_Laws.pdf. Vectro (talk) 14:54, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manager Tools Podcast. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120419061609/http://www.community.net.nz/how-toguides/volunteering/publicationsresources/manager-tools.htm to http://www.community.net.nz/how-toguides/volunteering/publicationsresources/manager-tools.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable Secondary Sources[edit]

I almost nominated this article for PROD, but I decided to do a quick google search and found a few good articles. I'm going to drop them here for someone else to add to the article in the future. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] TipsyElephant (talk) 17:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]