Talk:Mangrove swallow/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: DrStrauss (talk · contribs) 18:13, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
GA criteria[edit]
1. Well-written: PASS. Comment: article reads and flows well and is structured logically.
2. Good citations: PASS. Comment: article is well-sourced from a broad range of sources.
3. Broad in coverage: PASS. Comment: article covers all necessary aspects for a reader to become well-informed about its topic.
4. Neutral: PASS. Comment: birds aren't a particularly contentious issue so I think it'd be difficult to fail there!
5. Stable: PASS. Comment: no edit wars.
6. Illustrated: PASS. Comment: illustration photo is a good angle and the breast and side of the bird are clearly visible. The infobox is also impressive.