This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Hello Jwslubbock. Please see the tags in this revision for specific details about the issues with the version that you restored. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:56, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thanks for taking this to the talk page. I understand the concern about the awards section sounding promotional but I have tried to take out some unnecessary words that potentially sounded NPoV. But I think that the references to awards are part of the subject's notability and should remain for the time being. Sourcing seems generally ok to me, there's no self published stuff. If there are other issues you think should be improved, I'm happy to look at them. Jwslubbock (talk) 10:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Jwslubbock, you're welcome. Your edit did improve some of the NPOV issues, however the sourcing issues are still present. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:36, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, please stop removing credible citations from the page and then stating that sourcing criteria has not been fulfilled -- that is vandalism. 2A00:23C5:E114:2C01:C575:DD9C:133:E934 (talk) 11:01, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see you deleted all the sources again @MrsSnoozyTurtle. Can you please raise here on the talk page what you believe is the issue with the sources you are deleting before you just delete them? Without a discussion, it looks like edit warring, and on top of that it looks like you are deleting the awards and achievements of a woman from an underrepresented group. The awards a journalist wins are central to their WP:N, so I really don't understand why you are repeatedly coming to this page to remove the entire reason why a person of colour passes the Notability criteria. Women and people of colour are underrepresented on Wikipedia, and if you are coming to a page like this to delete all the references, you should have a good reason why you are doing this. If you keep doing this without explaining why, I will ask an admin to protect the page. Jwslubbock (talk) 11:30, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I hope that the last sentence of yours isn't meant to be a threat?
It is very frustrating that I try to improve the NPOV and reduce the unsourced text, only to be accused of vandalism and have the edits reverted without regard for WP:ROWN.
Regarding your request to raise the issues here, that is what I have done in the messages above. In fact it was me who started this Talk Page discussion. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 11:51, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What unsourced text are you referring to? You deleted, repeatedly, the entire section on Ganguly's awards, which are a core part of her WP:N. You provided no explanation for why you did this, and you seem to be claiming that the sources used are unreliable, without saying why you believe any of the references are unreliable. This is not how we edit Wikipedia, and you need to be more aware of the challenges Wikipedia faces with regard to the diminishing of achievements of women and people of colour. If you're going to delete all the achievements of a female person of colour, you need to explain why, otherwise it looks bad. So, if you are contesting here that all the sources used in the section on Ganguly's awards are unreliable, I would like you to explicitly identify which sources you believe are unreliable and why. If you can make a good case for this, then we can delete the sources and the facts they cite, but if you can't, we need to leave them there. So, over to you, which of the sources on this page are you contesting? Jwslubbock (talk) 15:16, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please refer to the tags, they are in the revision I posted a link to above when I started this discussion. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:09, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Please delete "last=#". It causes a CS1 error and the article appears on the list at CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list. (One of the vertical lines on either side of this parameter also has to be deleted. Thanks Ira Leviton (talk) 16:53, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
