Talk:Mare Nostrum (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Starwing Paradox (2 participants)
Pit (Kid Icarus) (8 participants)
Dancing Stage Max (3 participants)
Bez-MX (9 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (5 participants; relisted)
International Hobo (2 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Strago Magus (nom)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Missile Command 3D (nom)
Harold Halibut (nom)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (start)
Game Boy (nom)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Klefki (nom)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Lucky Luna (nom)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (nom)
38 Studios (start)
Pikachu (start)
Reigns (video game) (start)
Fallout Online (start)
Nuketown (start)
Donkey Kong (start)
Horizon Forbidden West (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

Re-creation[edit]

I recreated this article as neutral, factual, and cited as I could. In the interest of Disclosure; I am on the team developing this product, and so I encourage others to update/correct anything they deem needing of such. Cheers; Uncledrax (talk) 20:49, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. Full disclosure: I had a small part in bringing it to an admin's attention for deletion. I'm always okay with an article being re-created if it has appropriate sourcing. GameSpy is a solid source, and even though people usually ask for multiple sources of this kind I think this is good enough. You might want to use that source to create a "Reception" section. See Team_Fortress_2#Reception for an example of what I mean. Even though the game isn't released, you can highlight some comments from the gamespy review. This is the kind of thing that helps establish notability, and gives people some valuable context on the article. If you can find another reliable magazine or website that does this, it would help reinforce the article. Good job, and good luck! Randomran (talk) 17:53, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it looks like we are front-loaded with essentially self-sourced citations. I'll be looking to ensure we have a more diverse citation list as the article is matured. Thanks for the tips; Cheers; Uncledrax (talk) 19:34, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]