This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article does not reflect all opinions of Pallante, notably excluding criticism of her by pro-consumer rights groups such as the EFF and other notable opposition to her policies. ViperSnake151 Talk 16:18, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Exclude means removed. You probably mean the article "does not include" such information. By all means, you're welcome to add it. Personally speaking, I thought Pallante was the antithesis of what the Registrar of Copyrights should be. - kosboot (talk) 19:27, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, to exclude means to not include something. That is grammatically correct. ViperSnake151 Talk 19:12, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I see you've made edits since tagging the article. Discussion here seems to have died pretty quickly. I'm going to remove the POV tag, but if you still feel it's biased, given the short size of the article, I suggest you edit it to add in sourced material to correct that. TJRC (talk) 23:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
