Talk:Marine layer

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 August 2020 and 13 November 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): PolyMentos.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How can you tell it's SMOG?[edit]

The picture caption refers to the marine layer as being smog. In LA, we tend to call things smog when they aren't. I am not saying that the air in LA is great at all. Today's smog is mostly not visible (ozone, carbon monoxide). We have no evidence for SMOG being in the picture. There would need to be smoke with a distinct color or something like it. I propose to change the caption on the LA picture and remove the SMOG reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.179.137.5 (talk) 18:01, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Too Fast Deletion of Category[edit]

What gives with the way too rapid deletion of the category "Northern California Weather"? There was no notice on this page, and furthermore, why then does the category "Southern California Weather" remain? The same rationale must apply equally to both. I'm adding it back until there is further explanation and discussion. Tmangray 21:32, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal (from June Gloom and Catalina Eddy).[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to not merge the articles. Darkest tree (talk) 23:51, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The june gloom and catalina eddy articles are closely related to this one. Should they be merged? Rsduhamel (talk) 18:35, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who searched for "june gloom", I think it should definitely keep its own page. Steve Folta (talk) 09:36, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Steve. June gloom is a very commonly used phrase, and I think this article gives a pretty good summary of what it is, and how/where the phrase is used and applies. 72.67.11.114 (talk) 16:32, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Opposed to this merge too. June Gloom refers to the specific climate and geographical conditions at specific times of the year of southern California while marine layer is a general term that can apply to anywhere in the world any time of the year.--Oakshade (talk) 20:27, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I commented out the merge tag for June gloom after creating a link to that article in the flow of the text. Feel free to uncomment it if you think I was hasty. But, with the link, it's easy to see that both articles exist, so if a lot of people think it should be merged the topic will definitely come back.Mark Foskey (talk) 03:38, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I Oppose the merge with catalina eddy. Marine Layer should remain a separate article with links to specific notable examples. Q Science (talk) 14:22, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose--Mbz1 (talk) 15:51, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the merge notices. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:49, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as well, though it looks like I'm way late to this discussion anyway. I'll go ahead and close out the discussion. Darkest tree (talk) 23:51, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marine layer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110526050523/http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20040608/news_1m8gloom.html to http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20040608/news_1m8gloom.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:34, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]