Talk:Mario Götze

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:MarioGotze.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:MarioGotze.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:47, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Goatse[edit]

lol am I the only person who noticed that? I say we include it in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.234.138.36 (talk) 06:43, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - not unless it is covered by reliable publications -- generally newspapers and magazines. But no, you are not the only person to notice. (For those of you wondering what this is about, the editor is likely referring to goatse.cx.) --j⚛e deckertalk 06:56, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 11 June 2013[edit]

Please update Mario Gotze's page to show that he has moved club. It does not show it on the page, but it does on the source Th5 Blazez (talk) 16:49, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done He hasn't moved clubs though. He has signed a contract with Bayern Munich and that contract does not take effect until 1 July. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:26, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014 FIFA World Cup Final[edit]

Please change the final sentence to read as follows:

Götze came in as a substitute and scored in the 113th minute of the 2014 FIFA World Cup Final against Argentina to propel Germany to its fourth World Cup title.

Thanks. 68.165.77.254 (talk) 10:21, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 00:12, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gotze religion[edit]

See box. Formerip (talk) 20:29, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Result: Consensus is to include a brief mention of the subject's religion.

Four editors expressed themselves as opposed to inclusion of the material, but three of these editors also expressed themselves as being open to persuasion and/or being unconcerned about a brief mention, so opposition is quite weak overall. Nine editors supported inclusion. These editors seemed to be generally of the view that WP:UNDUE coverage of the subject's faith should be avoided and that coverage should be proportionate to its coverage in sources, which is minor.

It seems fairly clear, then, that there is consensus to include reference to the subject's religion so long as it is brief. The current wording in the article ("Götze is a Christian") seems to fulfil this.

Material about the subject's religion was recently added:

Götze is a Christian.Hinrichs, Miriam (26 June 2014). "«Ich danke Gott!»" (in German). jesus.ch. Retrieved 26 June 2014."Götze dankt Gott bei Facebook" (in German). Bild. 26 June 2014. Retrieved 26 June 2014.

Maybe if this had some context or relevance or the bio was fully written this could be considered for inclusion. I would leave this out for now unless it has some significance. --Malerooster (talk) 19:59, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It had more context before it was pared back drasically. It's part of the subject's personal life and it's a section on that. Not sure why anyone would exclude referenced personal information. It's not a WP:BLP violation. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:03, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
More context? That he is very religious? I would MAYBE include this as part of an early life section, ie about his family and upbringing, ect. Again, this "material" was added very recently with zero context and zero relevancy. It has absolutely nothing to do with why the subject is notable and really adds nothing to our understanding of the subject. What do others think? --Malerooster (talk) 13:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the original addition: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mario_G%C3%B6tze&diff=614479705&oldid=614053117
This is where the references were expanded: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mario_G%C3%B6tze&diff=614517482&oldid=614493900
It was redacted here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mario_G%C3%B6tze&diff=616760935&oldid=616755446
I'd be happy to restore the original sentence, "Götze believes in God and thanks him for everything in his life," in a new paragraph or even expanded as the second source goes into a great amount of detail. It should not be removed as has been done. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:13, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh course it should have been removed. A drive by IP adds this "material" for what reason? So we have a better understanding of who the subject is? This adds to our understanding of the subject how exactly? It still has ZERO context or relevance to the subject's notability. Its gratuitous and unnecessary. --Malerooster (talk) 02:12, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
For what reason? Because this is an encyclopedia and the material is relevant to the subject. While it's not important to you, it is to the subject and to several editors. I will be restoring with a paragraph to provide context. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Its not that it isn't important to me, I have given my reasons above and below again. Please WAIT for the RFC to run its course before reading this. As always, I try to defer to consensus, so, if a bunch of folks want to include it, I'll step aside. --Malerooster (talk) 16:05, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Should a mention of the subject's faith be included or is it unnecessary?[edit]

As you can see from the discussion one editor has strong feelings against including information about the subject's faith in the article while a few don't seem to have a problem with it. Is it gratuitous and unnecessary or encyclopedic material worth including in a biography? Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:05, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think that for most football players or sports people in general is unnecessary to mention their faith. It is not relevant for their notability. I can live with one or two sentences like "subject is a xxxx" (with source, of course) because without any clear-cut policy you are immediately heading for an edit-war if you remove the stuff and that's not worth it. --Jaellee (talk) 09:10, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's relevant to mention a sports person's religious beliefs (or lack of them as the case may be) as that's something that might interest the general reading public. So yes, it should be included.Be-nice:-) (talk) 12:22, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I actually don't have that strong feelings about it, but yes, in THIS case I would leave it out. In "full" blown bios, where family life, upbringing, ancestry is covered, it is sometimes included, especially if it has some context and relevance. In this case, I am not seeing it. If the subject has made public comments and feels strongly about his religion, then maybe include, which might be the case, I really don't know enough. I know that his religion was added pretty recently without any context or relevance, and that is why I objected. --Malerooster (talk) 16:02, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is a large article should leave it in. Thank you, MarioNovi (talk) 06:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is always relevant enough to include in a biography article. If an article is short, the solution is to add relevant information, not to exclude it. Red Slash 05:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • If it's appropriately supported by citation, then it should be in there. Even if it is of no interest to one reader, it may be to another. If it's the truth it should be included. I also agree with the above comment: the goal is to have complete articles, not abridged versions.Familygardner (talk) 00:27, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


  • I think it's fine Phil Kessel (talk) 02:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Irrelevant to his career/notability, and very poorly sourced. Such a brief "article" (nothing more than a reiteration of a Facebook post, apparently) is hardly sufficient to establish that this is a relevant fact from his biography--and the Jesus website has little more to offer (four short paragraphs, also based on a Facebook post--they seem not even to have talked to him). Facts need to have some kind of relevance before they're included; if we get better sourcing (more reliable, more in-depth), that's a different matter. Drmies (talk) 03:36, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well said. --Malerooster (talk) 22:00, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unless the person's faith is defining characteristic, I would probably just skip it. This would include clergy, saints, outspoken atheists and skeptics, terrorists who act in the name of a religion, entertainers who make a show of thanking some deity when accepting awards, occultists, fundamentalists who want to ban science from the classroom, etc. A single sentence would be alright, though. Just don't turn it into a more than a simple, brief statement of fact or else it becomes undue. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:39, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--I agree with NinjaRobotPirate about a single sentence being sufficient. It's also consistent with single references to religion on the pages of other athletes and public figures. One thing I would note is that I have seen him described in the press alternately as a "devout", "devoted", and "practicing" Christian. To me, those three words suggest different meanings. He's described in the wiki as "devout". I'm not sure if others are concerned about the distinction.

I edited the current version to say that he is a Christian. I though consensus was against me, but things seem to have tightened up. How and who decides how this RFC should be interpreted? --Malerooster (talk) 22:00, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Personally I think the one sentence reference in the personal section is fine. Phil Kessel (talk) 23:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I restored the previous sentence. Three references: one for each word? Grow up. I don't care if you don't share the person's faith, but it's clearly a larger part of his life than we have made room for. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:40, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Walter Gorlitz, who is the grow up comment direct at? Also, please don't make assumption's about editor's faith, that isn't productive or AGF. Thank you, --Malerooster (talk) 15:37, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the current revision re religion. My own view it's completely acceptable to refer to an individual's religion in a 'one sentence way' in a biographical sense (much the same as the # of siblings, the job of a parent, an original 'home town' is mentioned), but it shouldn't be more than that unless it's germane to the topic. imo, mentioning that Gotze is Christian is acceptable re his personal history - including qualifiers re his level of devotion isn't helpful, when there are varying media sources that use different terminology (i.e. 'devout', 'devote', 'practicing'). fwiw, out of a 'curiosity' sense, i looked at some of the pages for various soccer players, and a comment re religion isn't uncommon (in a simple way).Phil Kessel (talk) 05:37, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. To this point the RfC and sources contradict the "three word view" sentence. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:45, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
here are some examples --> he's called a "firm" and "committed" Christian - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2690910/Super-Mario-The-22-year-old-national-hero-goal-secured-Germanys-fourth-World-Cup-title.html a "devoted" Christian - http://greece.greekreporter.com/2014/07/14/world-cup-mario-gotze-star-germany/ there are also other instances. honestly i don't care that much. use the adjective you want. Phil Kessel (talk) 20:39, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • If it is a notable/relevant piece of information then it should be included. Is it relevant to an event that is being talked about out or is it just a fact? Putting the information in just to have more information is not a worthwhile. Has there been any reliable report of his religion? Are there quotes from him? Editingisthegame (talk) 18:33, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Its "just a fact", but most well written bios include religious upbring in an early life section or such. Its not really relevant per say, but. Yes, there are citations that mention his religion, see directly above your post. Ultimately, it comes down to "editorial" judgement as to whether to include or not. Hows that for covering both "sides" :). --Malerooster (talk) 14:06, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think the faith can be included as a mention in the infobox, with a source. That's all. Nothing else is needed. The only reason the faith needs to be mentioned in full or with more details is if it resulted in something, like say he was denied some opportunity on grounds of faith. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:50, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think it's one of those secondary features that should be added only when expressed voluntarily by the subject. For example, if an author is interviewed and asked about his faith, and he gives a meaningful and consistent (i.e. no "I don' care", "I don't know") response, enough to add something to the characterization of his person, or define better his life, I think it should be added. In the sources that have been given I see that Mario deliberately thanked God on Facebook, expressing his faith, and had up to 3 articles documenting the event (so people did see it), so I think in this case it should be left as it is. It doesn't really compromise the article, so I don't think there are any major problems with it. --JimmyBroole (talk) 20:37, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I kind of agree with some of the editors above. I think it should be included in a well-rounded biography if it is actually relevant to who the person is. I know "relevant" is a dicey word, but if it was a regular part of his upbringing (a la Jack White, Michael Jackson, or Kristen Bell), then I would include it in the Early Life section. If he has shown devotion or expressed belief AS AN ADULT (in interviews, donations, religious observance, etc...) to a religious ideology (or specific rejection of an ideology) I would include it in the Personal Life section. A person's religious beliefs shouldn't be avoided, but should be substantiated as actually belonging to that person, and not just some stamp inherited from their parents or inferred from original research.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 13:50, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The Lede[edit]

A big chunk of the lead is devoted to Götze's (and Germany's) performance at the U17 tournament. I think it's out of place in the opening and should be moved elsewhere - perhaps to the section on international play? Phil Kessel (talk) 02:52, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 July 2016[edit]


"Mario Götze (German pronunciation: [ˈɡœtsə]; born 3 June 1992) is a German footballer who plays as an attacking midfielder for Bayern Munich and the Germany national team."

It has now officially been announced that Gotze has moved to Borussia Dortmund. Therefore, I request you to please change his current club from Bayern Munich to Borussia Dortmund.

Source: http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11881/10507884/mario-gotze-set-to-seal-borussia-dortmund-transfer-sky-in-germany


61.0.29.182 (talk) 12:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - by another - Arjayay (talk) 13:33, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

transfer to dortmund summer 2016[edit]

Sky sports have reported just two hours ago the deal has been completed. I read the article and it does say he hasnt completed a medical however they do say that is all that stands in the way Theyoungy97 (talk) 13:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 July 2016[edit]

MoleMennell (talk) 12:19, 22 July 2016 (UTC) He is now at borussia dortmund[reply]

 Not done You need to provide a reliable source to support your statement. —MRD2014 T C 13:12, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image sizes[edit]

Forcing thumbnail size is not needed. See wiki/Help:Files#Using files. Generally, sizing should only be used when you want to force a small image to be large, not when you want to make a large image smaller. Several infoboxes make that clear. The fact that two of the five images are being forced larger than the 200 pixels by @Hurrygane: also means that "really slow/heavy when these pictures are being oversized" is not even a valid argument. If they're too large, registered users can set their own size. It's another reason for registering. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"It's another reason for registering". Readers come here for information; we should not write these pages to look messy, just to blackmail/force people to sign up. Because they don't even know about this (registered users can set their own size) feature. Hurrygane (talk) 14:15, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just to mention, this is an encyclopedia – not a photo-sharing service. Hurrygane (talk) 14:18, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That people come to wikipedia for information is great. I have no problems with that. Registration has its benefits. What looks messy is when images are forced to multiple different sizes. There is no blackmailing here other than from editors who don't know how to correctly use the image sizing function. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:27, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mario Götze. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:23, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Mario Götze. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:36, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:38, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mario_Götze&oldid=1207354590"