Talk:Marjorie Lynch

Marjorie Lynch has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 12, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red: Alphabet run: K & L (2022)

This article was created or improved during the Alphabet run: K & L edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in December 2022. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

A fact from Marjorie Lynch appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 January 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Daughters of the American Revolution opposed Marjorie Lynch's nomination to a government post due to her birth in Britain?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marjorie Lynch.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 02:50, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... ~~that British-born Marjorie Lynch served as deputy administrator of the American Revolution Bicentennial Administration?~~ Source: Stein, Alan J. (December 7, 2015). "Former Washington State Representative Marjorie Lynch is sworn in as Deputy Administrator of the American Revolution Bicentennial Administration on January 24, 1975". HistoryLink. Retrieved December 29, 2022.
- Reviewed:

Created by Sammielh (talk). Self-nominated at 18:09, 29 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]

New article (moved from draftspace), long enough. No obvious neutrality issues, all content has inline citations to reliable sources and Earwig returns no violations (false positive due to long organisation names and use of quotes). No QPQ required as this is the creator's fourth DYK. The images used in the article are correctly licensed. Thanks User:Sammielh - your suggested hook is fine, but I would also like to suggest the below alternative hook as I think the opposition to her nomination is quite interesting. ITBF (talk) 07:08, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- ALT1: ... that the Daughters of the American Revolution opposed Marjorie Lynch's nomination to a government post due to her birth in Britain?
  - I'm happy with ALT1, I agree that it is more interesting. Thanks @ITBF: Sammielh (talk) 18:37, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    - ALT1 is gonna need a review, because I'm not sure that ALT0 is quite gonna make the cut theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 01:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      - ALT1 is fully cited in article and fine. In this case, recommend using "Britain" instead of "United Kingdom". Striking ALT0. Cielquiparle (talk) 09:45, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

Passed. — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 06:25, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Marjorie Lynch/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MaxnaCarta (talk · contribs) 01:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

b. (citations to reliable sources):

c. (OR):

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Lead

Linked London
Changed "American Army" to United States Army, as this is how it's referred to in Early life and should be consistent, also linked
Linked Washington DC
Lead is good, no issues. Summarises the body without excessive detail.

Early life

Linked London
Linked Paris
Linked Christmas
Source to text integrity for first two sentences of early life using ref [1] is good.
Ditto for first and second sentence of paragraph two
Linked US Army and changed to United States

Political career

Source to text integrity for paraph one checks out for the use of ref [9]
Ditto for [17], [20], [25].

General Comments

I really struggled to find fault with this one. A few missing links, but this is great work. You certainly practice what you preach about attention to detail and text to source integrity Sammielh! Did not find a single spelling error, and prose is excellent. Learned a lot from you during your review of my work and vice versa. Appreciate it. Thanks! — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 06:18, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.