Talk:Marquette Building

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus = no move. JPG-GR (talk) 06:06, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marquette BuildingMarquette Building (disambiguation) — Based on the article traffic tool, Marquette Building (Chicago) should be at Marquette Building. —TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 14:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
  • Oppose. Other nominations based on this tool indicate that it gives no relevant evidence in terms of Wikipedia:naming conventions. Andrewa (talk) 23:37, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment What do naming conventions have to do with what people are actually trying to view. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TonyTheTiger (talkcontribs)
      • Naming conventions are the policies and guidelines we use to decide what to name articles, and an article name is what is under discussion here. Andrewa (talk) 08:38, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Marquette Building (Chicago) does not get the 90% of views that are generally required to make it the primary subject. Dan1980 (talk ♦ stalk) 18:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, for now. Using wikipedia page views to determine primary topic is problematically solipsistic. At the very least there needs to be a wider discussion about the appropriateness of using the tool for that purpose. olderwiser 19:04, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 14:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia talk:Web statistics tool for some discussion of the statistics tool. Andrewa (talk) 02:35, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.