Talk:Martin Fry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Initial section[edit]

The Seventh Taylor 00:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Were ABC really "New Wave"?[edit]

Were ABC really a "New Wave" group? Often the term New Wave gets used as if it were a synonym for punk rock, and I would hardly have thought that ABC were in the same category of pop music as groups such as the Sex Pistols, the Stranglers, the Boomtown Rats, the Clash or Sham 69. I would have thought that it would be more accurate to describe them as a New Romantic group. This was the wing which influenced a lot of pop music after punk rock/New Wave had had its dominant influenced a lot of pop groups. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 19:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, the article called List of New Romantics includes ABC - in fact, they are the first pop group on the list. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 19:38, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this question would best be left on the ABC talk page instead? Best, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 14:10, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Six singles[edit]

The opening to this article says that ABC had six singles which entered the top 20 in the U.K. singles charts in the 1980s, and then says "including" - but goes on to name all six singles. Would it not be better to say "which were" than "including" here? Vorbee (talk) 18:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Martin Fry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Martin Fry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:52, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]