Talk:Maryland Route 300/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk · contribs) 21:57, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence starting with "MD 300, which connects Church Hill..." is just cramming too much into it to read properly. The last part of the sentence reads awkward (I needed to read it multiple times to understand the full detail).
- I rewrote that sentence and a few other sentences in the Lead to make them easier to read. Let me know if I introduced any more needless complexity. V C 01:16, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Both the main paragraphs are rather long—I would have chopped them both in two, but you don't have to if you have some good reason to keep them together.
- I was thinking of splitting the paragraphs before I nominated the article. Your opinion prompted me to do it. V C 01:16, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The last, unnumbered reference—what is it referencing?
- Is this the bullet with the link "Queen Anne's County"? It is part of Ref 17. Ref 1 uses the same template and has the same scheme. V C 01:16, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise looks good. Placing on hold. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:57, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review, Arsenikk. V C 01:16, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Arsenikk ^(talk) 19:00, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]