Talk:Master of the Housebook

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Germany Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sold?[edit]

User:Historiograf says the housebook has been sold, but I can't see this on google, nor has he changed his local German article. Does anyone have more information? Johnbod (talk) 02:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See here: the housebook will come back to Wolffegg until the juridical questions are cleared. So far: open end. Look at the German blog "Archivalia" (see link) from time to time or take google by "hausbuch wolfegg". --84.144.107.45 (talk) 01:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC) (i. e.: Felistoria, German wp)[reply]

Thanks. The German is too much for me, but I see we have this [1] Johnbod (talk) 01:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind:-), let's begin with the pictures, see here. There is an article in German wikipedia "Hausbuch (Schloss Wolfegg)" [2]. Then you can find a transcription of an 1887-edition here. The important source for "The Master of the Housebook" is: Daniel Hess: Meister um das „mittelalterliche Hausbuch“. Studien zur Hausbuchmeisterfrage. Von Zabern, Mainz 1994, ISBN 3-8053-1656-9. (You see: you have more:-). The case of selling the piece for presumable 20 million Euro is one in a row which is going to become more and more important not only for German scientists; the question of bewaring your cultural heritage is an international problem and in Germany it's becoming a more and more political one. user:Historiograf is an expert for any questions in cases like that. You can contact him per email via de:wp. --84.144.107.45 (talk) 01:57, 24 February 2008 (UTC) (i. e.: Felistoria, German wp)[reply]

Yes I saw we had more pics, but not all these. They were not linked to the right category - Category:Meister des Hausbuches, which I have done. Johnbod (talk) 02:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New pics added - much better! Johnbod (talk) 02:48, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Master of the Housebook. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]