Talk:Matthew Irmas

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 April 2024. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

This page was proposed for deletion by Vegantics (talk · contribs) in the past.
It was contested by Mushy Yank (talk · contribs) with the comment:
Directed 3 notable films, thus meeting WP:DIRECTOR

Proposed deletion[edit]

This is a space to discuss the proposed deletion of the Matthew Irmas article. My inclination is to delete it for the reasons outlined below, but I would appreciate a discussion with anyone who feels otherwise.

A preliminary search for resources on Irmas provides little indication of notability per WP:N. The three citations are all reviews of films associated with the subject, failing WP:SIGCOV. The article is over a decade old and has been a stub the entire time, I believe both because the subject is not notable enough to generate much interest and because there has been little to add in terms of reliable, substantive, secondary coverage.

Vegantics (talk) 15:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, While I appreciate your honesty and the fact that you opened this section, may I say that if you feel a PROD needs to be discussed, then it's probably because the article is not suitable for PROD (=obviously uncontroversial deletion). Thanks,-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 19:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It just felt like a courtesy to allow for conversation, I can communicate less in the future.

Vegantics (talk) 19:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My point was not for you to communicate less, my apologies if that was unclear. On the contrary, thank you for the courtesy. It's just that imv PRODDing means that one believes that no discussion should be needed. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 20:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]