Talk:Max Payne (film)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable:
- a (Layout): b (citations to reliable sources): c (No original research):
- a (Layout):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects) b (Summary style)
- a (major aspects)
- It is neutral point of view.
- It is stable.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Great. This article has passed it's GA. Regards, World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 06:35, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- As the review above is fake, but a CSD on it was declined (which would have allowed it to be restarted), this article has been deleted from Good Article status. It blatantly fails the GA criteria, including excessive non-free image use, uncited statements, inadequate lead, basic Wikipedia MoS and WP:MOSFILM violations, excessive focus on the MPAA rating, and the use of non-reliable sources (including IMDB). -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 13:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)