Talk:Mazda MPV

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I believe the van's nearing the end of its production run. It's not doing that well in the US. --LeoTheLion 00:48, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yes, Mazda has confirmed that the MPV may or may not return after next year. --SFoskett 13:31, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

Just like when CX-7 & CX-5 replace Tribute as their two-row wagons, Mazda5 & CX-9 replace MPV as three-row wagons. -- Bull-Doser 23:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Except that the Tribute is returning for 2008, North America may recieve the redesigned MPV in 08 or 09, and the MPV is only being discontinued here. IFCAR 23:39, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2nd 1st-gen MPV photo[edit]

A good picture of a facelifted 1st-gen MPV was removed because of a formatting issue. It's in the History. Could anyone try to work out why the image won't appear where it's placed, and get it back into the article? IFCAR 00:08, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is an "agressive headlight"?

Under the picture is states that this vehicle has a FR/All Wheel Drive layout. But this is incorrect since it is actually a rear wheel drive platform with the option of 4WD. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.2.246.33 (talk) 12:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wait- Mazda is owned by Ford? (Mpv was called Fords best minivan) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redguard117 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Transmission problems?[edit]

From what I've heard the autotrans in the 2nd gen is rubbish for a vehicle of the size (rather than a 626)- blowing three within 100,000km, etc. Sources would be useful. Nevard (talk) 05:31, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Third gen. in Thailand[edit]

Article wrote "The third generation MPV is currently available only in Japan, Hong Kong and some small number in Thailand". Mazda Thailand does not sell this car. Another car-importer companies in Thailand are import Mazda MPV from Japan.

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2007/08/29/auto/auto_30046836.php (The Nation (Thailand)) : "The MPV tested here is imported from Japan by the SEC group"

--Love Krittaya (talk) 16:33, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mazda MPV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090918121234/http://media.ford.com/plant_display.cfm?plant_id=129 to http://media.ford.com/plant_display.cfm?plant_id=129

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:02, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]