Talk:Medical journalism

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Medical journalism received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Useful Sources?[edit]

[1] [2] [3] Unomi (talk) 07:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More than 10 years old? For a topic like medical journalism, I'd hope that newer sources would be used (except perhaps for the history section, once one gets written). Eubulides (talk) 07:42, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NHS Behind the Headlines[edit]

Perhaps this service by the NHS would be an appropriate external link. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:15, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's already there, in Medical journalism #Reviews. Eubulides (talk) 23:18, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; I hadn't looked there. Technically, external links (such as the two in that section) aren't supposed to be in the text of the article like that. Should we move them out of the article to the correct section? WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:31, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out. I did that. Eubulides (talk) 06:06, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Medical journalism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090110012618/http://www.healthnewsreview.org:80/how_we_rate.php to http://healthnewsreview.org/how_we_rate.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:53, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Magazines for Libraries[edit]

A standard reference for librarians that reviews magazines in all fields, including magazines for the general public and major professinal magazines, is Katz' Magazines for Libraries https://lib2.colostate.edu/howto/keyjrl.html

When I used it, one of its largest chapters was on medicine and health. I think there were a couple of hundred entries, consisting of reviews of each magazine by an expert, in about 600 words. There was also a good general introduction to medical magazines.

Magazines for Libraries could be a source of evaluations of popular medical magazines that is much more relevant to readers, authoritative, objective, and accurate than the personal opinions of editors which have crept into this article.

The Bulletin of the Medical Library Association may also be useful. --Nbauman (talk) 16:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Medical journalism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]