Talk:Men's Collegiate Lacrosse Association

Untitled[edit]

Kevlax46: This page was in need of an update. All relevant information in the article was outdated (2009-2010), including the latest MLL draftee, and current venue for the National Championships. I also added pertinent details regarding the National Championship, and how each team qualifies for the annual Tournament. In addition, I also created a section about the current executive members of the MCLA board. Whether or not this section is essential to the article is certainly debatable. I added this section to shed some light on the inner workings of the MCLA, and the personnel that enable the organization to operate. Also, the Media section required some updating. Throughout the past few years, the MCLA has expanded in affiliation as well as national attention. As a result, the MCLA has been making great strides to promote the sport through live broadcasts and online streaming. This was not mentioned in the previous article, and needed to be brought to light.

I also propose that pictures be posted, (perhaps of the current National Champions? D1, D2) As well as an updated headline news section that may be of some interest. (in 2009, the ASU lacrosse team was suspended for hazing and underage drinking...) (after the 2011 season the University of Michigan (former MCLA team) transferred to an NCAA varsity program, entering the Big Ten conference) etc. All updates - 8.18.2012

Kevlax46: is the Executive board section necessary ?? Whether or not this section is essential to the article is debatable... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevlax46 (talk • contribs) 03:59, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Taken from User talk:67.160.213.2

Could you be a bit more specific. If you are refering to the lax mag on the Men's Collegiate Lacrosse Association page it is because it is spam. IMO it is put in there not to add anything to the article but just to advertise it.

Starting with the 2008 season, a magazine will be available by subscription that will be dedicated to covering the MCLA, its games, players, coaches, and fans. MCLA The Lax Mag will be offered 6 times during the season and once in the fall.

It reads like an ad, especially when you put it near the the top of the article and if I recall correctly the link was placed at the top of the external links. You may want to read this Wikipedia:SPAM. Smith03 (talk) 05:15, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So what if it reads like an ad. Who made you sole keeper of the MCLA ? The mag is dedicated to the league -- why shouldn't it be listed on the page? User:67.160.213.2

for the reasons I gave below. Why do you keep putting this back in? Do you profit from the magazine? Smith03 (talk) 23:23, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NO -- the league profits both financially and growth. i'll go all night. you want to help the league or just be wikipedia nazi -- you don't think collegelax.us profits? User:67.160.213.2

Well we can remove collegelax.us as well Smith03 (talk) 21:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC) You may want to read Wikipedia:No personal attacks as well. Are you User:Agentogden? Smith03 (talk) 22:23, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You CAN remove Collegelax, but you haven't. I really don't see the problem with listing the magazine as part of the description of the MCLA. For what reason would you not want people to know that the league has a magazine dedicated to it? User:67.160.213.2

You can also remove Collegelax if you want to. The problem is as I stated below it is spam. I find it hard to believe you do not have anything to do with the magazine when the only edits you have made under this account have been to re insert the same spam message. if this magazine was free I would not care but it clearly is an attempt to use wikipedia to advertise for a magazine. I can keep reverting just as much as you can. Smith03 (talk) 04:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Men's Collegiate Lacrosse Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:53, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]