Talk:Messerschmitt Bf 109/GA2

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DraconianDebate (talk) 15:10, 24 October 2009 (UTC)~~~~[reply]

There are two giant problems with this article. Firstly, nearly all of the web-based sources are dead links. Those that are not, are either self-published or only related to periphery elements of the article. These citations must be updated, before this article can pass GA review. Secondly, the section on Variants makes up most of the article, does not follow the criteria for Summary Style , and needs to be made into its own article, with a much reduced summary put in its place. Due to the large amount of work to be done, and the fact that the work needed to be done to make this article worthy of being a Good Article would almost certainly take longer than the On Hold process can give, this article has failed its GA Review. Should the changes I have outlined be put into place, then this article will be worthy of Good Article status, and I would happily review it again myself.