This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This redirect has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Does this little community actually merit a separate article? —SlamDiego←T 05:51, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Consensus is that all verifiable places are inherently notable, and thus warrant an article. However, there are concerns that this is not an actual place, but rather a nickname for another community. I found this source, which mentions the governor of Illinois traveling to Mexico, Illinois, so it seems to be a real community. –JuliancoltonTropicalCyclone 15:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, no. You misread "Governor George H. Ryan today announced that he will be traveling to Mexico, Illinois' second largest trading partner, and meeting with President Ernesto Zedillo and President-elect Vicente Fox." --John Nagle (talk) 15:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hauser, Philip M. and Evelyn M. Kitigawa, editors; Local Community Fact Book for Chicago 1950. Chicago, Illinois : University of Chicago, 1953. p258
This seems, then, to be a genuine place. If consensus really supports the madness of an article on every verifiable place, then this article should stand. —SlamDiego←T 01:33, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. However, while all verifiable places have been deemed inherently notable, borderline verifiability is usually dealt with on a case-by-case basis. Thus, it might be best to revert the redirecting of the article, and send it to AFD. –JuliancoltonTropicalCyclone 01:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I hate to think how many AfDs could result from dealing with articles about this sort of place. —SlamDiego←T 07:32, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]