Talk:Michael Hagemeister

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 September 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Russia: Science & education / Religion Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the science and education in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the religion in Russia task force.

Jewish history Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Yours truly,--Ludvikus 05:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ovladenie vremenem[edit]

A question has been raised as to the ISBN of the above title. I give the following 2 titles from the WEB as follows:

Ovladenie vremenem

Murav'ev, Valerian Nikolaevic Nachdr. d. Ausg. Moskva 1924 / nebst e. einführenden Studie von Michael Hagemeister. München. Sagner. 1983. 27, 127 S.. Specimina philologiae slavicae ; 051. ISBN 3-87690-231-2

Ovladenie vremenem: [izbrannye filosofskie i publicistiÏceskie proizvedenija]

Murav½ev, Valerian NikolaeviÏc ; Aksenov, G.P. Moskva. ROSSPÇEN. 1998. 318 S.. Filosofy Rossii XX veka. ISBN 5-86004-146-2

Yours truly, --Ludvikus 21:58, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article has the following:

   * Ovladenie vremenem

   [ed.] Michael Hagemeister
   (Munchen: O. Sager, 1983)
   ISBN 3-87690-232-1 Parameter error in {{ISBN}}: checksum

There is clearly a flip in the last 2 digits of the ISBN. I'll correct it forthwith. --Ludvikus 22:02, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Useless link[edit]

I removed this useless/inaccessible link:

Michael Kutuzov-Tolstoy, The Story of my Life, Preface by Michael Hagemeister [1]. --Ludvikus (talk) 21:23, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hagemeister's recent writing on the authorship of the PSM[edit]

Here's the scoop: [2] --Ludvikus (talk) 18:29, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Professorships[edit]

As I understand it, he was hired temporarily (probably as full professor) while the Chair was away or while the search for a new Chair was ongoing. This kind of temporary full professorships (Lehrstuhlvertretung) is quite common in Germany (somebody has to do the teaching during the 1-3 years it typically takes to fill a position). —Kusma (t·c) 18:49, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Temporary professor might be better wording. Any idea of what his current situation is (from those 2 CV's at the bottom of the page)? Professor, visiting scholar, researcher or what?Guccisamsclubs (talk) 19:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kusma: If you ever feel like it, please come back to the page and add some info about Hagemeister's two most recent positions. I don't know German and don;t want to rely on google translate lest I make an error in a BLP. thanks Guccisamsclubs (talk) 21:53, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sources on academic weight of Hagemeister[edit]

Are there any better sources on the academic 'authority' of Hagemeister as regards the PEZ and Nilus than what are currently given? From what I've read, he does appear rather prolific in his research and his considerations of the claim of forgery in France, with commentary on Nilus being relevant as regards that. However, as regards his wider academic import, the main sources currently given here are a single paper on Russian immigrants' supposed influences on National Socialism in which his work is mentioned; A review of this same paper; And a paper on Serafim of Sarov (Which I have admittedly not read in its entirety) in which he is mentioned solely in footnotes, and where his standing is not actually written about. Other than this, there is the other source of Richard Levy, not given in the introduction to the article, which does call him a 'leading authority'. But the current form of the article seems to simply be a modified format of its original stub, in which he is referred to as the 'foremost authority' on the PEZ and Nilus without any sources, with some very peripheral citations attached to a revised form of this statement. More direct sources, then, ought to be given in the introductory part, and the citations throughout the article should generally be improved. Zusty001 (talk) 14:50, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]