Talk:Michael Keith Smith/Archive 2
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archives
Is there any reason for deletion of the talk pages as well as the article?
JASpencer 21:46, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- CSD:G8 contemplates that talk pages of deleted pages are deleted too. If there's anything you need to see from the discussion, please ask me or any other admin as we can pull it out. Stifle (talk) 10:03, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Deleted Article
Its now back, why is this? The article was deleted in June and since then the subject seems to have done nothing further to make himself notable. Also I note that, although shorter, the article contains some of the exact same passages as the previous version.--Edchilvers 15:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- User:James Loughton put this back in. Of the two people who have contributed to this article since the article, Mr Loughton and myself, neither of us contributed to the AfD discussion. Personally I think that it was a bad decision. JASpencer 21:04, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Presumably you feel the AfD nomination was a bad thing? Keep up the good work. Chilvers aka Sandy Dancer have now left (or said they have). Chelsea Tory 21:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Fuck off--Edchilvers 21:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- How about adding information to the article concerning Mr Keith-Smith's association with the extreme right? The article makes it sound like he is a patriotic conservative, but the forum dedicated to his political group is almost entirely contributed to by members of the BNP and fascists. It is misleading and should be corrected. 15:42, 6 August 2007 81.159.24.203
- Have a go proving that by reliable sources. --Counter-revolutionary 15:58, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- I have never had any connection with the 'extreme right', by which I suppose this anonymous user means the BNP. CDA forums are freely open to all, and known contributors include supporters of the Labour and LibDem Parties as well as the Conservative Party and UKIP. Obviously there is a bias to the right, but most contributors are anonymous and are not known to be registered supporters of CDA. Posts promoting illegal acts are not permitted. Mike Keith Smith (talk) 08:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC)